<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The inconvenient evidence piles up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/2012/08/the-inconvenient-evidence-piles-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/2012/08/the-inconvenient-evidence-piles-up/</link>
	<description>Climate Change Advisor for Shell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/2012/08/the-inconvenient-evidence-piles-up/comment-page-1/#comment-87458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/?p=1729#comment-87458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would recommend climate science advisor and fan of Hansen and his GISS to read following article. Is GISS global temperature reconstruction suitable for scientific research? It is outlier even between other land based measurements (which are still quite inaccurate). Perhaps Hansen should spend more time on quality control rather than doing political activism. 

http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/blog-memo-to-james-hansen-regarding-giss-southern-hemisphere-land-surface-temperature-data/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend climate science advisor and fan of Hansen and his GISS to read following article. Is GISS global temperature reconstruction suitable for scientific research? It is outlier even between other land based measurements (which are still quite inaccurate). Perhaps Hansen should spend more time on quality control rather than doing political activism. </p>
<p><a href="http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/blog-memo-to-james-hansen-regarding-giss-southern-hemisphere-land-surface-temperature-data/" rel="nofollow">http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/blog-memo-to-james-hansen-regarding-giss-southern-hemisphere-land-surface-temperature-data/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/2012/08/the-inconvenient-evidence-piles-up/comment-page-1/#comment-86974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/?p=1729#comment-86974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is very bad case of disinformation from David. GISS is led by activist Hansen and it has nothing to do with JPL which is managing MSL rover. Quite opposite, many key people in NASA are opposed to the bad science coming from GISS and especially from the political activist directing GISS. Also Muller - head of BEST overshoot his statement. He has difficulty with peer - review his work as his statements are way beyond his work. Even some of his co-workers are turning against him. July as a warmest month in US seems to be bogus. It is a shame that some people just try to do anything to promote their agenda. I would recommend any scientific advisor to spend more time investigating facts and less PR press reading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very bad case of disinformation from David. GISS is led by activist Hansen and it has nothing to do with JPL which is managing MSL rover. Quite opposite, many key people in NASA are opposed to the bad science coming from GISS and especially from the political activist directing GISS. Also Muller &#8211; head of BEST overshoot his statement. He has difficulty with peer &#8211; review his work as his statements are way beyond his work. Even some of his co-workers are turning against him. July as a warmest month in US seems to be bogus. It is a shame that some people just try to do anything to promote their agenda. I would recommend any scientific advisor to spend more time investigating facts and less PR press reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/2012/08/the-inconvenient-evidence-piles-up/comment-page-1/#comment-86701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/?p=1729#comment-86701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2012/08/climate-distortion.html
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/08/an-incovenient-result-july-2012-not-a-record-breaker-according-to-the-new-noaancdc-national-climate-reference-network/

Some different perspective on NASA GISS PNAS and July data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2012/08/climate-distortion.html" rel="nofollow">http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2012/08/climate-distortion.html</a><br />
<a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/08/an-incovenient-result-july-2012-not-a-record-breaker-according-to-the-new-noaancdc-national-climate-reference-network/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/08/an-incovenient-result-july-2012-not-a-record-breaker-according-to-the-new-noaancdc-national-climate-reference-network/</a></p>
<p>Some different perspective on NASA GISS PNAS and July data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
