Archive for the ‘Antarctica’ Category

Back to Antarctica

Back in 2009 this blog was kicked off by a trip to Antarctica for the NGO 2041. Over the last two weeks I have had the privilege to return, again with 2041. This is an NGO that is dedicated to the preservation of the continent as a last untouched place on earth – the name derives from the 50th anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty which imposes a moratorium on mining and resource extraction form Antarctica, but with the possibility of review of that provision in the 2040s.

2041 run annual expeditions to the Antarctic Peninsula in a bid to help younger people understand the importance of the continent with the potential that some of them may be in a position to make a difference on the outcome of any review in 30 years time. This overarching story about Antarctica serves as a backdrop for a deeper dive into sustainability and environmental issues, including climate change.

I gave a series of presentations on climate change over the two weeks, drawing extensively from the material in this blog and from my recent book. When I spoke in the theatre on the ship, the world’s largest cache of fresh water was visible through the window beside me; as ice stored in the mighty glaciers of the Antarctic continent.  A chain of events is now unfolding leading to a gradual reduction in ice mass in Antarctica, thereby raising sea levels and slowly impacting coastlines the world over. The young people in the audience will have to deal with this legacy.

On the trip we saw a different legacy of sorts, with a stop at Whalers Bay in Deception Island; I use the word “in” here because you literally sail into the island to reveal its splendour. Whalers Bay is a sombre place where for a period of some thirty years early in the 20th Century killed whales were brought ashore for rendering and extraction of their valuable oil. Although US whale oil use had almost vanished by 1900, it continued on globally for some time after this, being used for lamp oil, soap and margarine. But by the 1930s when Whalers Bay was eventually abandoned, whale oil prices globally had collapsed as substitutes for almost all its uses had been found. Electricity, crude oil and vegetable oils brought this industry to an end. Whalers Bay is an interesting place to contemplate the market shifts we may see this century!

To close out, here are a few of my photographs from the expedition. The final photograph is of a rare sighting of a sperm whale near Cape Horn.










Talking about climate change

  • Comments Off on Talking about climate change

From the rarefied atmosphere of the Swiss Alps to a small London theatre, there has been a lot said about climate change over the last couple of weeks.

The World Economic Forum held its annual retreat at Davos, with climate change high on the agenda. Much of the discussion was about building additional momentum towards a UNFCCC led agreement in Paris at the end of this year. Business leaders, politicians and other prominent people from civil society reiterated the need for a strong outcome. World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was more specific and called on leaders to “break out of the small steps of business as usual and provide that structure, first and foremost by putting a price on carbon”. The call for more emphasis on carbon pricing has been a strong World Bank theme for a year now.

While there was good talk emanating from Davos, in Brussels the scene was very different. The EU Parliament ITRE Committee (Industry, Research and Energy) was apparently not listening to the calls from Davos and instead ended up with “no opinion” on the important proposals required to support the carbon price delivered by the EU ETS, through the early implementation of the proposed Market Stability Reserve (MSR). The “no opinion” outcome was the result of not supporting the need to start the MSR early and use the 900 million backloaded allowances as a first fill, but then rejecting an alternative proposal on how the MSR should be taken forward. The only silver lining in this otherwise dim cloud is that the debate is about the proposed structure of the MSR, rather than whether an MSR should be present at all. Nevertheless, it is disappointing that some industry and business groups in Brussels did not seem aligned with the recognition that many of their member CEOs were giving to the carbon pricing discussion in Davos just a few hundred miles away.  The proposals for the MSR now have to go to the important ENVI (Environment) Committee in Parliament as well as to the Member States, where there is cause for optimism that they will adopt a position in favour of a stronger MSR reform.

One business group did give very strong support to the MSR proposals, the UK and EU based Corporate Leaders Group (CLG). This organisation started its life 10 years ago, which means it is also celebrating a landmark birthday along with the EU ETS. The CLG sits under the Cambridge University Institute for Sustainability Leadership, with the Prince of Wales as its patron. This is a group that has been talking about the need for a robust carbon price in the EU for many years and backing that talk up with strong advocacy in Brussels and various Member State capitals. Birthday celebrations were held in London to mark the occasion, with the Prince of Wales in attendance. The CLG was a step ahead of the World Bank with its own Carbon Price Communique back in 2012. While the World Bank effort has garnered greater support than the original CLG effort, it is worthy of recognition that the current push for this important instrument had its roots in the business community.

Despite the important talk in Brussels and Davos, the real talk on climate change came from a small theatre in Sloan Square, London. Climate change might seem like an odd subject for the London theatre scene, but nevertheless there it was. Chris Rapley, former head of the British Antarctic Survey, more recently the head of the Science Museum and now Professor of Climate Science at University College London, staged an engaging one man show to talk about the climate. This wasn’t the Inconvenient Truth with its high profile narrator and 200 odd PowerPoint slides, but more a fireside chat about paleo-history, the atmosphere, trace gases and the global heat balance. Here was a man who had spent the majority of his life studying this issue, from field measurements in Antarctica to computer analysis of satellite observations and his message was very clear; we are in trouble. There was no alarm, no hysteria and no predictions of an apocalypse, but just a softly spoken physicist explaining his job and describing with great clarity what he had learned over the course of some forty years of hard work. The audience was engrossed by the monologue and the gently changing backdrop of graphs and charts that seemed to envelop the speaker.

Chris Rapley 2071

This production is a unique approach to communicating the climate change issue to a new audience. It is small in scale, but it will get people thinking about the subject and hopefully discussing it in less partisan terms. The show, 2071, has now completed a second short run in London but may be destined for some other venues. I would highly recommend it.

The real issue

  • Comments Off on The real issue

As CO2 levels in the atmosphere continue to rise (and given the current state of global action they could quite possibly go on rising for much of this century) we hear a great deal about storms and droughts but not a huge amount about the really difficult issue that most countries face, rising sea levels.

Although the hydrological cycle will inevitably change as a result of rising temperatures, there is still much research going on to understand what this means in terms of global, regional and local precipitation. By contrast, a great deal seems to be known about sea level, CO2 and temperature, thanks to the paleoclimate record. This was the subject of the first session of the 31st MIT Global Change Forum which was held in Brussels last week in association with Université Catholique de Louvain. The specific focus was the interglacial periods of the last million years which saw global temperatures and CO2 levels at 1850 (i.e. pre-industrial) levels. These relatively warm periods occur every 100-150,000 years (we are in one now) as a result of the additional heat falling on the planet from small variations in the earths orbit around the sun.

The most recent inter-glacial peak was the Eemian, about 130,000 years ago, which saw both CO2 levels and temperature peak at the top end of the inter-glacial range, but with the CO2 level far below the current 390 ppm. There is good evidence that the sea level in this period topped out at some 7 metres above current levels, before plunging 135 metres as glaciation took hold in the northern hemisphere.  This of course raises the issue of where sea level might peak as a result of the current elevated levels of CO2, although the analysis that was presented was more about where so much water would actually come from.

Certainly there is enough in Greenland to raise sea levels another six metres, but we know that Greenland didn’t melt completely during the Eemian period as we have much older Greenland ice cores. Rather, the evidence points to a partial melting of the Greenland ice sheet followed by the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. The former contributed some 2.2-3.4 metres of sea level rise and the latter 4.4-6 metres. During this period the polar regions of the northern hemisphere experienced temperature rises of 3-5°C, in response to a global temperature rise of 1-2°C, or less. The rate of sea level rise was 5-6 mm/year or ~5.6 metres over 1000 years. This sounds like an extraordinary amount of time, but we shouldn’t forget that some buildings in both London and Paris are already nearly 1000 years old and still in use! We also shouldn’t forget that the extra radiative forcing driving the change today is likely to be quite a bit more than in the Eemian period. 



Estimates of near term sea level rise vary significantly, with some studies showing an overall change of up to 2 metres  by the end of this century, considerably more than that given in the IPCC 4th Assessment Report. Such a rise could be very disruptive and require considerable relocation of people and infrastructure (see below, Long Island).


It was an interesting session and set the stage for another excellent MIT conference.

Unrelated to MIT but nevertheless related to the subject above is some recent holiday reading that I enjoyed. The novel, Ultimatum by Matthew Glass, is set in 2033 just as a new President is coming into office in the United States. It is a world that has tried hard but done little to address emissions. By this time the US already has a Relocation Program underway, in response to rising sea levels and more severe storm surges. In his first meeting with the outgoing President, the new Commander in Chief learns that sea level rise is accelerating (a fact kept from the public) and that a much more ambitious relocation program must be established. He also learns that a diplomatic initiative with China to agree on real and decisive cuts in emissions is going nowhere. With a President faced with potential social catastrophe in the decades ahead, so a real political page turner begins, ending, not surprisingly in an ultimatum situation with the Chinese over emissions. It’s a good read and puts the science into an interesting political perspective.

A final word and video on Antarctica . . .

  • Comments Off on A final word and video on Antarctica . . .

Getting back to work this week hasn’t been easy – too much on my mind, too much to contemplate about the trip. But Bonn awaits early next week as I head off to meet with some of the national delegations at the first formal meeting of 2009 leading to Copenhagen. More on that in subsequent posts.

This video was shot by Kyle O’Donoghue for 2041 and it brilliantly captures the trip in just a few minutes.

2041 Expedition to Antarctica from David Hone on Vimeo.

Finally, if you are interested in seeing where exactly we went, you can download a Google Earth kmz file and have a look. It doesn’t show the path of the ship, just all the land stops and my meanderings – as it was my Garmin GPS watch that collected it all.

As you will have read over the past three weeks, I have had the huge privilege of visiting the continent of Antarctica.

First of all, two acknowledgements, to Robert Swan at 2041 for asking me to come on his expedition and talk about climate change and to Shell for supporting me.

David and Robert Swan on the Antarctic Peninsula

David and Robert Swan on the Antarctic Peninsula


Unlike the Arctic, Antarctica is not a place to really see the effects of climate change, at least not yet. There is strong anecdotal evidence of changes on the Antarctic Peninsula and there have been some spectacular break ups of big ice shelves over the last few years, but despite recent findings published earlier this year in Nature, the science is not yet clear on the fate of this continent and its vast ice coverage as the world warms – but it is hard to rationalise that nothing will happen there.

Visiting Antarctica is quite an overwhelming experience. Standing on the rugged shore (no docks here) in a remote bay watching penguins go about their business and whales feed in the icy water, it makes you think about what the world was once like, before humans shaped it for our own use. We have “geo-engineered” the planet and its atmosphere in just 1000 years, with the bulk of it happening in the last 100 years.

There is little true land-based wilderness left, just pockets here and there, but even they are usually inhabited or used by man.

Mankind has also changed the composition of the atmosphere. First it was local air pollution, then regional impacts and now it is global. We have already seen that global change in the atmosphere does have an impact. The ozone layer thinned following a build-up of Chloro-Fluoro-Carbons (CFCs), perhaps the most telling aspect of our presence on this planet for a long-term visitor to the Antarctic. But we have also demonstrated that these local, regional and even global issues can be addressed and that a balance can eventually be restored.

Now humans are altering the quantity of greenhouse gas components in the atmosphere with scant collective thought about what it really means for the future. The issue is highlighted again in the Guardian today with an article about Nicholas Stern . Lord Stern has shown us very clearly that there is an economic rationale for addressing the build-up of CO2 and other GHGs in the atmosphere, yet as the article discusses we persist in an endless debate on the issue itself.

As a person with a science and engineering background, the issue is very simple and it astonishes me that the simple physics behind what is happening in the atmosphere is so disputed. The facts are clear:

  • Humans are raising the level of CO2 and other GHGs in the atmosphere through the huge level of global industrial activity.
  • We all know and have known for over 100 years that GHGs, in particular CO2, are key regulators of our long-term global environment.

Given this, we shouldn’t be surprised to expect a change if we double or triple the level of these gases in the atmosphere or (like CFCs) we introduce them in significant quantities for the very first time.

Despite the fact that we have enormous regard for science and take it for granted in devices we use every day (such as the computer you are reading this blog on), we seem bent on not believing our atmospheric chemists and others like them who have worked just as hard at establishing their base of knowledge as those who led the way for transistors, semi-conductors and now nanotechnology. It’s a bit like being given some very bad health news by a world leading oncologist then visiting 99 other doctors with various qualifications until one tells us that we will probably be OK and then deciding that this is the one that must be right – and it turns out his specialty isn’t oncology and he might not be a doctor at all – but we believe him anyway.

We can even measure the change in infrared absorption over the last 30 years yet still we argue the point.

Changes in outgoing long-wave radiation 1970-1997 (satellite)

Changes in outgoing long-wave radiation 1970-1997 (satellite)





Nicholas Stern has also outlined the key elements of a global deal. It’s not complicated, but it will require an unprecedented level of global cooperation to agree and implement. But as I saw on my Antarctic expedition, attended by people from over 20 countries, that level of cooperation is possible.

So now I am back in the real world of politics and self-interest (and e-mail) and today the first round of international talks (for 2009) in the lead-up to Copenhagen starts in Bonn.


There is much to do !






Some final photos from Antarctica

  • Comments Off on Some final photos from Antarctica
An albatross following the ship in the Drake Passage.

An albatross following the ship in the Drake Passage.


A fur seal on the Antarctic Peninsula

A fur seal on the Antarctic Peninsula


Closing in on the face of a glacier

Closing in on the face of a glacier


Some sunlight at last

Some sunlight at last


Some sunlight at last

Some sunlight at last


A gentoo penguin

A gentoo penguin


Gentoo penguins after a swim

Gentoo penguins after a swim


Ice is nice

Ice is nice


Birdlife in the Antarctic

Birdlife in the Antarctic


A glacier face in Paradise Harbour

A glacier face in Paradise Harbour


A curious leopard seal circling our Zodiac boat


Back in Buenos Aires

We left the Antarctic Peninsula in something of a rush on Tuesday morning. The expedition arose early to view the incredible Lemaire Channel, which narrows to some 800 metres with mountains of at least that height rising vertically from the channel itself on both sides. But the weather was dreadful and whilst we got some idea of the majesty of this scene, we really saw very little. Our first scheduled stop after the Lemaire was pretty much a washout as well. Apart from the hardy satellite guys who need the steadiness of dry land to upload the various blog posts and other messages, none of us made it ashore.

A few Zodiac excursions were arranged, but those onboard (me included) were soaked through within minutes as waves broke relentlessly over the bow of these tiny vessels and driving snow, ice and wind made it almost impossible to make progress.

An early executive decision was made to abandon plans for our last shore visit and head back to Ushuaia instead, given that the storm we were now in the midst of could make progress across the Drake Passage pretty slow. So we headed off into a Force 8 gale and the Drake gave us its best (well we thought it was pretty bad but the old hands on board still insisted it was nothing much).

Not many made it to dinner that evening as sea legs proved to be less than ready for the onslaught. The Akademic Ioffe is a brilliant ship and very stable, but 6+ metre waves lifted the ship high out of the water with the flipside zero G feeling as the vessel dropped down the back side of the swell to sea level. After a dozen or so of these in the space of a few minutes most have had enough – but this is like a broken carnival ride – there is no getting off.

Crossing the Drake Passage (the calm bit)
Crossing the Drake Passage (the calm bit)
The storm passed but the rest of the passage was rough nevertheless. On Thursday afternoon (March 26th) we spotted Cape Horn and officially “rounded the Horn” together with the cruise ship Amsterdam heading in the opposite direction.
The Amsterdam rounds Cape Horn

The Amsterdam rounds Cape Horn

So now I am back in Buenos Aires, but still a day from London. It took most of today to get from Ushuaia to here, with delays and distance rminding me that Antarctica really is a distant land.
Plotting the course across Drake's Passage

Plotting the course across the Drake.

A more traditional (b)log.

A more traditional (b)log.

Missing posting – Icebergs, whales and a canary

  • Comments Off on Missing posting – Icebergs, whales and a canary

It appears that the satellite e-mail has lost an entry from Antarctica, so here it is:

After a day of trekking on King George Island and a good look at the 2041 E-Base, we woke this morning (Friday 20th March) on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula in the Weddell Sea. This is a very different world to that experienced only 18 hours earlier. Vast icebergs litter the ocean, with the steel grey colour of the water brought to life by the eerie blue luminescence of the ice just below the surface.

Glacial ice litters the Weddell Sea

Glacial ice litters the Weddell Sea

Not far – in Antarctic terms – south of our current location is the vast Larson B ice-shelf, much of which collapsed into the sea a few years back. Ice shelves do come and go, that is certain, but they seem to be doing more going than coming on the Antarctic Peninsula at the moment. Experienced travellers to this remote continent will confirm that ice debris in the Weddell Sea is at a high and recent research published in Nature earlier this year has presented strong evidence that the Antarctic is now showing a warming trend and that the peninsular is taking the brunt of this.

In the early days of coal mining a canary was used to give early warning of gas build-up and impending doom for the miners if they didn’t change direction. The Arctic canary is long dead and the Antarctic one is looking decidedly wobbly on the perch. How many signals do we need to tell us that we must change the direction of our energy future? (Thanks to Robert Swan for this nice analogy given today in one of his “Leadership on the Edge” talks).

Apart from the icebergs and the calving glaciers, what else did the Antarctic have to offer today – if that wasn’t enough the expedition was captivated by a pod of humpback whales which decided to introduce themselves to the ship this morning. What started as a distant plume sighting – accompanied by a thousand digital images of pretty much empty sea – ended up with whales so close that the people at the bow of the ship were scrambling to attach wide angle lenses to cameras just to be able to fit them in. None of the expedition leaders had ever seen whales so close and even some of our Russian crew came out on deck for a look – and they have supposedly seen it all !!

A humpback whale in the Weddell Sea

A humpback whale in the Weddell Sea

The return

  • Comments Off on The return

As we return to Ushuaia, you can follow the progress of the ship by clicking on the IAE 2009 “Current Location” graphic:  

There was movement at the station . . .

  • Comments Off on There was movement at the station . . .

This is not a continent that sits quietly whilst visited. Movement, noise and odour are prominent and all are to be found in abundance in a penguin colony. Many of the colonies have started their journey north, but some remain and we visited one on Sunday (March 22nd) afternoon.

The first sensation that hits the visitor as the rookery nears is the smell. Apart from swimming, eating, breeding and standing with bemused looks, penguins must spend the remainder of their time defecating – and they do it whilst standing which perhaps explains the bemused look. With literally thousands of penguins in a relatively small area, the end result is a rookery knee deep (their knees not mine) in penguin pooh, with a smell to match. But these are creatures that really don’t mind visitors and it isn’t long before they are curiously sidling up to us, just to see what we are about. They are also pretty busy as well, leaping in the water, swimming vigorously, leaping out, offspring chasing parents for food, noisy exchanges and of course the smell – I mentioned that but it deserved a reminder – I got one when I put my jacket on again the next morning and could still detect the odour that had permeated the fabric the day before. Noise and movement in Antarctica isn’t limited to the penguins though – the glaciers add their bit as well.

On Monday we visited Neko Harbour in the morning and Paradise Harbour in the afternoon, both sites of spectacular glaciers nestled between towering peaks and both vigorously calving with bits ranging in size from a small car to a medium sized office block falling into the sea at regular intervals. Each incident is typically preceded by a tremendous crack as the ice splinters followed by the roar of the collapse itself. A miniature tsunami then rushes across the harbour as a result, deluging the shore of the beach opposite. To add to this, the mountains of snow precariously attached to the cliff faces regularly let forth with small avalanches rushing down the slopes. Even the most impatient visitor doesn’t have to wait long to be rewarded with some form of glacial entertainment. The more patient ones will see the spectacular.


Our visit to Paradise Harbour was also highlighted by the sighting of several leopard seals and the appearance of the sun in the late afternoon, thereby allowing the harbour to live up to its name. The light here is somehow different to the rest of the world – perhaps it is the clean dry air. Whatever the reason, we were treated to an afternoon display on the glaciers and icebergs which shifted dramatically from moment to moment and left the expedition members with little else to do but look in amazement and bring cameras to the ready. This posting will be sent from our last stop before heading back into Drakes Passage. The satellite system used by 2041 only works with a clear and stable line of sight, but then it effectively delivers broadband speed. All being well I should be in contact again from Ushuaia or Buenos Aires before heading back to London.